You are required to read and agree to the below before accessing a full-text version of an article in the IDE article repository.

The full-text document you are about to access is subject to national and international copyright laws. In most cases (but not necessarily all) the consequence is that personal use is allowed given that the copyright owner is duly acknowledged and respected. All other use (typically) require an explicit permission (often in writing) by the copyright owner.

For the reports in this repository we specifically note that

  • the use of articles under IEEE copyright is governed by the IEEE copyright policy (available at http://www.ieee.org/web/publications/rights/copyrightpolicy.html)
  • the use of articles under ACM copyright is governed by the ACM copyright policy (available at http://www.acm.org/pubs/copyright_policy/)
  • technical reports and other articles issued by M‰lardalen University is free for personal use. For other use, the explicit consent of the authors is required
  • in other cases, please contact the copyright owner for detailed information

By accepting I agree to acknowledge and respect the rights of the copyright owner of the document I am about to access.

If you are in doubt, feel free to contact webmaster@ide.mdh.se

Sequential Composition of Execution Time Distributions by Convolution

Fulltext:


Authors:

Marcelo Santos, Björn Lisper, George Lima , Veronica Lima

Note:

Best paper award.

Research group:


Publication Type:

Conference/Workshop Paper

Venue:

Proc. 4th Workshop on Compositional Theory and Technology for Real‐Time Embedded Systems (CRTS 2011)


Abstract

Embedded real-time systems are increasingly being assembled from software components. This raises the issue how to find the timing properties for the resulting system. Ideally, these properties can be inferred from the properties of the components: this is the case if the underlying timing model is compositional. However, compositional timing models tend to provide a simplified view. An important question is then: when is a compositional model accurate enough to meet the requirements for an analysis that is based on the model?In this paper we consider a simple, statistical compositional model for execution time distributions of sequentially composed components, which assumes that the distributions of the underlying random variables are independent. This assumption is only approximately correct in general, as dependencies can appear due to both software and hardware effects. We have made an experimental investigation of how hardware features affect the validity of the timing model. The result is that for the most part, the effect of hardware features on the validity of the model is small. The hardware feature with the strongest influence in the experiment was the reorder buffer, followed by branch table associativity, L2 cache size, and out-of order execution.

Bibtex

@inproceedings{Santos2215,
author = {Marcelo Santos and Bj{\"o}rn Lisper and George Lima and Veronica Lima},
title = {Sequential Composition of Execution Time Distributions by Convolution},
note = {Best paper award. },
editor = {Robert Davis and Linh Thi Xuan Phan},
pages = {30--37},
month = {November},
year = {2011},
booktitle = {Proc. 4th Workshop on Compositional Theory and Technology for Real{\&}{\#}8208;Time Embedded Systems (CRTS 2011)},
url = {http://www.es.mdh.se/publications/2215-}
}