You are required to read and agree to the below before accessing a full-text version of an article in the IDE article repository.

The full-text document you are about to access is subject to national and international copyright laws. In most cases (but not necessarily all) the consequence is that personal use is allowed given that the copyright owner is duly acknowledged and respected. All other use (typically) require an explicit permission (often in writing) by the copyright owner.

For the reports in this repository we specifically note that

  • the use of articles under IEEE copyright is governed by the IEEE copyright policy (available at http://www.ieee.org/web/publications/rights/copyrightpolicy.html)
  • the use of articles under ACM copyright is governed by the ACM copyright policy (available at http://www.acm.org/pubs/copyright_policy/)
  • technical reports and other articles issued by M‰lardalen University is free for personal use. For other use, the explicit consent of the authors is required
  • in other cases, please contact the copyright owner for detailed information

By accepting I agree to acknowledge and respect the rights of the copyright owner of the document I am about to access.

If you are in doubt, feel free to contact webmaster@ide.mdh.se

Safety vs. Sustainability Design: Analogies, Differences and Potential Synergies

Authors:

Guillermo Rodriguez-Navas, Leticia Duboc , Stefanie Betz , Ruzanna Chitchyan , Birgit Penzenstadler , Colin C. Venters

Research group:

Formal Modelling and Analysis of Embedded Systems

Publication Type:

Conference/Workshop Paper

Venue:

Fourth International Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Sustainable Systems

Publisher:

CEUR-WS

Abstract

The idea that there are important parallels between safety and sustainability and that software engineers might be able to take lessons learned from safety and apply them to sustainability has been voiced and initially explored before. This paper extends the analysis of similarities, differences, and potential synergies between the two concepts, according to four different dimensions of these domains: systemicity, complexity, certification and social perception.

Bibtex

@inproceedings{Rodriguez-Navas4149,
author = {Guillermo Rodriguez-Navas and Leticia Duboc and Stefanie Betz and Ruzanna Chitchyan and Birgit Penzenstadler and Colin C. Venters},
title = {Safety vs. Sustainability Design: Analogies, Differences and Potential Synergies},
month = {August},
year = {2015},
booktitle = {Fourth International Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Sustainable Systems},
publisher = {CEUR-WS},
url = {http://www.es.mdu.se/publications/4149-}
}