You are required to read and agree to the below before accessing a full-text version of an article in the IDE article repository.
The full-text document you are about to access is subject to national and international copyright laws. In most cases (but not necessarily all) the consequence is that personal use is allowed given that the copyright owner is duly acknowledged and respected. All other use (typically) require an explicit permission (often in writing) by the copyright owner.
For the reports in this repository we specifically note that
- the use of articles under IEEE copyright is governed by the IEEE copyright policy (available at http://www.ieee.org/web/publications/rights/copyrightpolicy.html)
- the use of articles under ACM copyright is governed by the ACM copyright policy (available at http://www.acm.org/pubs/copyright_policy/)
- technical reports and other articles issued by M‰lardalen University is free for personal use. For other use, the explicit consent of the authors is required
- in other cases, please contact the copyright owner for detailed information
By accepting I agree to acknowledge and respect the rights of the copyright owner of the document I am about to access.
If you are in doubt, feel free to contact webmaster@ide.mdh.se
On the Correlation between Testing Effort and Software Complexity Metrics
Note:
preprint version (2018-12-01)
Publication Type:
Manuscript
Abstract
Software complexity metrics, such as code size and cyclomatic complexity, have been used in the software engineering community for predicting quality metrics such as maintainability, bug proneness and robustness. However, not many studies have addressed the relationship between complexity metrics and software testing and there is little experimental evidence to support the use of these code metrics in the estimation of test effort. We have investigated and evaluated the relationship between test effort (i.e, number of test cases and test execution time) and software complexity metrics for industrial control software used in an embedded system. We show how to measure different software complexity metrics such as number of elements, cyclomatic complexity, and information flow for a popular programming language named FBD used in the safety critical domain. In addition, we use test data and test suites created by experienced test engineers working at Bombardier Transportation Sweden AB to evaluate the correlation between several complexity measures and the testing effort. We found that there is a moderate correlation between software complexity metrics and test effort. In addition, the results show that the software size (i.e., number of elements in the FBD program) provides the highest correlation level with the number of test cases created and test execution time. Our results suggest that software size and structure metrics, while useful for identifying parts of the system that are more complicated, should not be solely used for identifying parts of the system for which test engineers might need to create more test cases. A potential explanation of this result concerns the nature of testing, since other attributes such as the level of thorough testing required and the size of the specifications can influence the creation of test cases. In addition, we used a linear regression model to estimate the test effort using the software complexity measurement results.
Bibtex
@unpublished{Muslija5420,
author = {Adnan Muslija and Eduard Paul Enoiu},
title = {On the Correlation between Testing Effort and Software Complexity Metrics},
note = {preprint version (2018-12-01)},
month = {December},
year = {2018},
url = {http://www.es.mdu.se/publications/5420-}
}
