You are required to read and agree to the below before accessing a full-text version of an article in the IDE article repository.

The full-text document you are about to access is subject to national and international copyright laws. In most cases (but not necessarily all) the consequence is that personal use is allowed given that the copyright owner is duly acknowledged and respected. All other use (typically) require an explicit permission (often in writing) by the copyright owner.

For the reports in this repository we specifically note that

  • the use of articles under IEEE copyright is governed by the IEEE copyright policy (available at
  • the use of articles under ACM copyright is governed by the ACM copyright policy (available at
  • technical reports and other articles issued by M‰lardalen University is free for personal use. For other use, the explicit consent of the authors is required
  • in other cases, please contact the copyright owner for detailed information

By accepting I agree to acknowledge and respect the rights of the copyright owner of the document I am about to access.

If you are in doubt, feel free to contact

Safety Case Maintenance: A Systematic Literature Review



Carmen Carlan , Barbara Gallina, Liana Soima

Publication Type:

Conference/Workshop Paper


40th International Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability and Security




Safety standards from different domains recommend the execution of a process for keeping the system safety case up to date, whenever the system undergoes a change, however, without providing any more specific guidelines on how to do this. Even if several (semi)automated safety case maintenance approaches have been proposed in the literature, currently, in the industry, the execution of this process is still manual, being error prone and expensive. To this end, we present in this paper the results of what is, to the best of our knowledge, the first Systematic Literature Review (SLR) conducted with the goal to provide a holistic overview of state-of-the-art safety case maintenance approaches. For each identified approach, we analyze its strengths and weaknesses. We observe that existing approaches are pessimistic, identifying a larger number of safety case elements as impacted by a change than the number of the actually impacted elements. Also, there is limited quantitative impact assessment. Further, existing approaches only address a few system change scenarios when providing guidelines for updating the safety case.


author = {Carmen Carlan and Barbara Gallina and Liana Soima},
title = {Safety Case Maintenance: A Systematic Literature Review},
month = {August},
year = {2021},
booktitle = {40th International Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability and Security},
url = {}