You are required to read and agree to the below before accessing a full-text version of an article in the IDE article repository.

The full-text document you are about to access is subject to national and international copyright laws. In most cases (but not necessarily all) the consequence is that personal use is allowed given that the copyright owner is duly acknowledged and respected. All other use (typically) require an explicit permission (often in writing) by the copyright owner.

For the reports in this repository we specifically note that

  • the use of articles under IEEE copyright is governed by the IEEE copyright policy (available at http://www.ieee.org/web/publications/rights/copyrightpolicy.html)
  • the use of articles under ACM copyright is governed by the ACM copyright policy (available at http://www.acm.org/pubs/copyright_policy/)
  • technical reports and other articles issued by M‰lardalen University is free for personal use. For other use, the explicit consent of the authors is required
  • in other cases, please contact the copyright owner for detailed information

By accepting I agree to acknowledge and respect the rights of the copyright owner of the document I am about to access.

If you are in doubt, feel free to contact webmaster@ide.mdh.se

An Ontological Interpretation of the Hazard Concept for Safety-Critical Systems

Fulltext:


Note:

This uploaded paper is an excerpt from Jiale Zhous Ph.D thesis.

Publication Type:

Conference/Workshop Paper

Venue:

The 27th European Safety and Reliability Conference


Abstract

The hazard concept has been extensively used in the literature and defined in an informal way, which serves as a guidance on identifying the potential hazards during the development of safety-critical systems. Intuitively, the definitions seem to be consistent and easy to understand. However, when we take a closer look at these definitions, ambiguities may arise, and real-world semantics need to be defined. In this work, we propose a hazard domain ontology, i.e., the Hazard Ontology (HO), to provide an ontological interpretation of hazard. To tackle the aforementioned issues, the HO is grounded in the Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO) to utilize the benefits provided by taking foundational concepts into account. Finally, we show some useful findings when we use the proposed ontology to analyze the hazard descriptions from an industrial passenger train project.

Bibtex

@inproceedings{Zhou4707,
author = {Jiale Zhou and Kaj H{\"a}nninen and Kristina Lundqvist and Luciana Provenzano},
title = {An Ontological Interpretation of the Hazard Concept for Safety-Critical Systems},
note = {This uploaded paper is an excerpt from Jiale Zhous Ph.D thesis.},
month = {June},
year = {2017},
booktitle = {The 27th European Safety and Reliability Conference},
url = {http://www.es.mdh.se/publications/4707-}
}